Dedicated printing-ink grade
M-52
Compare rutile titanium dioxide grades for printing inks, including dedicated ink grades and multi-application pigment options.
M-52
M-350 and M-2377
M-510
M-52
| Use context | Selection priorities | Validation | Candidate grades |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dedicated white printing ink | Dispersion, opacity, gloss and binder compatibility | Evaluate in the target ink vehicle and dispersion equipment | M-52 |
| General printing inks | Opacity, gloss, oil absorption and formulation compatibility | Compare against the incumbent pigment at equal loading | M-350, M-2377 |
| Offset, letterpress and intaglio | Dispersion and press wear, viscosity response and print appearance | Run a press-relevant trial and inspect equipment wear | M-510 |
| Grade | Process | TDS-listed applications | Selected current TDS data | Technical data sheet |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M-52 | Sulfate process | Printing inks; Can coatings; High-gloss interior architectural coatings | TiO2 content: 94.5%; Oil absorption: 14 g/100 g; Moisture when packed: 0.3% maximum | Request M-52 TDS |
| M-350 | Chloride process | High-end decorative paints; Printing inks; Automotive paints; Industrial paints; Plastics | TiO2 content: 93.5% typical (92.5% minimum); Rutile content: 100% typical (99.0% minimum); Oil absorption: 18 g/100 g typical | Request M-350 TDS |
| M-510 | Chloride process | Interior and exterior architectural coatings; Automotive OEM and refinish paints; Coil, anticorrosion, decorative, and powder coatings; Letterpress, offset, and intaglio printing inks; Engineering plastics, masterbatch, and profiles | TiO2 content: 94.5%; Rutile content: 99.9%; Tinting strength: 118% | Request M-510 TDS |
| M-2377 | Not stated in current TDS | Coatings and paints; Printing inks; Plastics; Rubber and paper | TiO2 content: 93.0% minimum; Rutile content: 97.0% minimum; Oil absorption: 16-20 g/100 g | Request M-2377 TDS |
Values shown are taken from the current grade-specific TDS and are not a sales specification. Confirm formulation suitability and current document revision before purchasing.
Technical data sheets are provided by email after request. Select the grade you want to evaluate.
Start with the grade table on this page, then narrow the choice using your formulation, benchmark, processing conditions, and target performance. Final suitability should be confirmed by application testing.
No. Process is one selection factor. Surface treatment, end-use fit, technical properties, binder or polymer compatibility, and test results should be reviewed together.
Use the grade-specific TDS links on this page. The selected technical data sheet is provided by email after request.
Share your formulation, benchmark, application, quantity, and destination for a qualified grade discussion. Request Quote Request Sample